3rd anniversary of ECHR Euro Clowns’ covering up German civil servant Jürgen Sonneck’s and alias “C. Paucher”

German Registrar Claudia Westerdiek, imbued with exquisit cultural and symbolic capital, and complemented by habitus. Section V – European Court of Human Rights. Expertly executed by judge Potocki in Single-judge decision. Potocki meanwhile retired.

The complaint and background is here and here the letter from a year ago.

Complaint 51482/18

01/17/2019

The European Court of Human Rights has decided in a single-judge setting to declare the above complaint inadmissible.

The decision of the Court is annexed hereto.

This decision is final and is not subject to appeal to a tripartite committee, a chamber or to the Grand Chamber. Therefore, you will not receive any further letters from the Court in this case. The Court shall not keep the file in its archives for more than one year from the date of this decision. (1)

This Decision shall be rendered in one of the two official languages of the Court (English or French) and shall not be translated into other languages.

The Registry of the European Court of Human Rights

. . . . . . . . . .

DECISION

(Application no. 51482/18)

introduced on 29 October 2018

The European Court of Human Rights, sitting on 10 January 2019 in a single-judge formation pursuant to Articles 24 § 2 and 27 of the Convention, has examined the application as submitted.

The Court finds in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or the Protocols thereto and that the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention have not been met.

The Court declares the application inadmissible.

André Potocki

Judge 

Just trust The German Connection. No relation to The French Connection. I have that on good authority from “Popeye” Doyle.

The German Connection at the ECHR.

And here is His Stupidity Jürgen Sonneck in person. Why did nobody tell moron Jürgen the IP address is transmitted when you send an email to police?

Racist and criminal Jürgen Sonneck

So then calling someone a “heterosexual” could be a criminal insult in Germany as well?

If there is any logic left, yes. Here we go again. Germany and its most ridiculous law, the section 185 criminal code ‘Libel/slander/insult’. It goes back to 1794. “The Prussian General Land Law of 1794, for example, contained more than 150 offences that punished a wide range of defamation offenses” (Wikipedia) and every year German courts are clogged with this egomaniacal posing as they handle more than 200,000 cases. Some of them keep the Clowns of Karlsruhe (Constitutional Court) busy. Germans love to sue and the German press was more or less constantly seeing former President Trump’s famous oneliners as insults. Just google “präsident trump beleidigt”. To put it plain and simple, section 185 is one of Germany’s ways to infringe free speech. Remember the Böhmermann/Erdogan saga? The court ruled part of his poem were acceptable, another part not. It seems best to read only parts of Baudelaire’s poems. Just to be safe.

Here is the case. ‘Calling a man a “faggot” and/or a “pussy”, or: insulting him‘ (German language). It is from German uber blogger in all things legal, retired judge Burhoff. He presents himself on Twitter as “Blog author”, not blogger! 

This is the underlying case where a person, unhappy about an online purchase of Audemars Piquet (sic!) products for, hold your pants, 580 € (so it can only be parts), calls the other party a “faggot”, suggests getting a blowjob and sees him as a  candidate for a lunatic asylum.

“The injured party pp. bought in January 2019 from the defendant products of the brand Audemars Piquet at a price of 580 €. After transferring the money and sending the goods, a dispute arose about the completeness of the delivery or defectiveness of the goods. After the injured party suggested a partial repayment of €100 to the defendant, the defendant replied by text message with: “little pussy,get a blowjob” (“kleine pussy,lass dir einen blasen”). When the aggrieved party expressed his displeasure at what he considered to be an insulting statement and stated, among other things, that he would press charges, the defendant responded with: “do it, faggot”, “your lawyer will have you committed!” (“mach das, schwuchtel”, “dein anwalt wird dich einliefern lassen !”) and “in the norderstrasse in hh-aktona they like to take in pussies like you!” (“in der norderstrasse in hh-aktona nehmen sie so pussys wie dich gerne auf !”). The injured party felt that his honor had been violated by the defendant’s statements, which was also the defendant’s intention.”

(“norderstrasse in hh-aktona” is partly a misspelling and means “Norder Street in Hamburg Altona” where a lunatic asylum is located.)

The Local court (Amtsgericht) saw the term “faggot” as an indisputable insult:

To the conviction of the court, the description of the injured party as a “faggot” by the defendant is in any case a formal insult, which exceptionally does not require a weighing of the conflicting interests.

This does not make any sense as the court did not, so it seems, establish the sexual orientation of the person addressed. So it could be the plaintiff is gay. If not, it has to be asked why do German courts see a reference to a gay sexual orientation as an insult? As the plaintiff feels insulted by being called a faggot, is he himself discriminating people of gay sexual orientation? Does he consider them to be below heteros in status?

Suppose the accused had said “do it, hetero”. What then? You are white and someone calls you a nigger. What then? Is the simple use of that word, completely not in tune with reality, to be seen as an insult? Surely a German court would find a way. Hey, this stuff is heavy, can you sherpa that?

Consider this, being gay in Germany was a crime till 1994!!! 

Section 175 was a provision of the German Criminal Code from 15 May 1871 to 10 March 1994. It made homosexual acts between males a crime, and in early revisions the provision also criminalized bestiality as well as forms of prostitution and underage sexual abuse. All in all, around 140,000 men were convicted under the law.

Here’s a case from France “Gay slur aimed at hairdresser ‘not homophobic’ – French ruling“.

A Paris tribunal has ruled that calling a male hairdresser a “faggot” is not homophobic – “because hair salons regularly employ gay people”.

The paper ‘Slurs, Stereotypes and Insults‘ sheds some light on

Metaphorical Occurrences

Among the insultive uses, there are some that are characterised by the fact that the speaker lacks any classificatory intention accompanying the derogatory one. In terms of an example, a father who utters,

19) You are a little faggot! Why have you refused to sing?

to rebuke his son for having refused to sing in front of an audience does not have the intention to classify him in a certain stereotypically characterised group of people, namely, the group of male homosexuals, though he does have a derogatory intention aimed at his son as much as the group at stake. From our perspective, the speaker is then actively endorsing the ‘faggot’ stereotype, which could be described as follows:

‘faggot’ = COWARDLY, VANE, EFFEMINATE, SENSITIVE, PROMISCUOUS, MORALLY CORRUPT, etc.

It is then an insultive use of the slur or an act with the subkind of insultive illocutionary force we have been focusing on. However, there are two features that allow us to distinguish this kind of use from the previous examples: on the one hand, as we mentioned above, it does not involve an expressively loaded classificatory intention on the speaker’s part and on the other, the use is not a literal but a figurative one. In accounting for this phenomenon, we will appeal, once again, to the Gricean notion of conversational implicature (Grice 1975)

As is known, Grice understands figurative discourse, paradigmatically, metaphors and ironies, in terms of non-literal contents that are derived from literal ones by means of conversational implicatures. In terms of one of Grice’s examples, in using a metaphor like

20) You are the cream in my coffee,

the speaker intends to communicate that her addressee has some features concerning which he is similar, imaginatively, to the substance at stake, that is, the cream in her coffee. Likewise, we will claim that in uttering, the father intends to communicate that his son has some features concerning which he is similar to stereotyped male homosexuals, namely, some of the features of the above-mentioned stereotype, such as COWARDLY, EFFEMINATE, SENSITIVE, etc. Schematically, the father’s statement has two contents:

(i) a semantically expressed content <my son is a faggot>

(ii) a pragmatically communicated content <my son is cowardly, effeminate, sensitive>

The content in (ii) is derived from the content in (i) by the flouting of the First Maxim of Quality: what the speaker semantically expresses (that his son is a faggot) is literally false, but in so doing he pragmatically communicates or conversationally implicates something he believes to be true (that his son is cowardly, effeminate, sensitive). The father’s main intention in uttering is thus to insult his son in an indirect way, namely, not by means of what he semantically expresses (that his son is a faggot) but by means of what he pragmatically communicates (that his son is cowardly, effeminate, sensitive). He insults his son not by including him in the stereotyped group of male homosexuals but by ascribing him the features constitutive of the ‘faggot’ stereotype with their concomitant negative global value. In the terms of the previous section, in uttering, the father intends his son to grasp his contempt by forming the (second-order) belief that he (the father) believes him (the son) to be (not a stereotyped male homosexual but) cowardly, effeminate and sensitive (together with acknowledging his negative global evaluation and his negative feelings for the people having those features).

(end of quote)

Read as well ‘The Fa-Word: An Insulting Slur In the Spotlight‘. 

“… in this age of anti-bullying, there is renewed effort to get kids to stop using all kinds of slurs. He alludes to a campaign against the word “retarded,” made visible by public service announcements featuring Jane Lynch of Glee. He also points to a recent full-page advertisement in The New York Times urging people to stop saying “gay” to dub something undesirable or repugnant, as in “That’s so gay.”

In fact, Stuever suggests, this might be the next anti-slur frontier: the scrubbing away in popular parlance of the word “gay.” Or, as he perhaps presciently refers to it, “the G-word.”

Here are the douchebags (possibly an insult) of the German blog ‘Netzwelt’. They dare not write the German word for ‘bitch’ “Schlampe”. It’s “Schl*mpe. Guys, sis, you got to be fuckin’ shittin’. Wittgenstein would seriously have considered suicide on this.

How would a German court decide if s.o. verbally transgendered and called a person a ‘dickish pussy’, or a ‘penile cunt’? Questions, questions, questions.

No idea what the problem is. Calling someone an asshole is either correct or if not, you are the asshole. So what’s lost? In any case there is an asshole around. Case closed.

“You’re an acid junkie college flunky dirty puppy daddy bastard

Cuz you’re filthy (filthy)

Oooh, and I’m gorgeous (gorgeous)”

2nd anniversary of ECHR Euro Clowns’ covering up German civil servant Jürgen Sonneck’s idiocy to hide behind the alias “C. Paucher”

Potocki_Westerdiek

German Registrar Claudia Westerdiek, imbued with exquisit cultural and symbolic capital, and complemented by habitus. Section V – European Court of Human Rights. Expertly executed by judge Potocki in Single-judge decision.

The complaint and background is here and here the letter from a year ago.

Complaint 51482/18

01/17/2019

The European Court of Human Rights has decided in a single-judge setting to declare the above complaint inadmissible.

The decision of the Court is annexed hereto.

This decision is final and is not subject to appeal to a tripartite committee, a chamber or to the Grand Chamber. Therefore, you will not receive any further letters from the Court in this case. The Court shall not keep the file in its archives for more than one year from the date of this decision. (1)

This Decision shall be rendered in one of the two official languages of the Court (English or French) and shall not be translated into other languages.

The Registry of the European Court of Human Rights

. . . . . . . . . .

DECISION

introduced on 29 October 2018

The European Court of Human Rights, sitting on 10 January 2019 in a single-judge formation pursuant to Articles 24 § 2 and 27 of the Convention, has examined the application as submitted.

The Court finds in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or the Protocols thereto and that the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention have not been met.

The Court declares the application inadmissible.

André Potocki
Judge
 
Just trust The German Connection. No relation to The French Connection. I have that on good authority from “Popeye” Doyle.
 

The German Connection at the ECHR.

And here is His Stupidity Jürgen Sonneck in person. Why did nobody tell moron Jürgen the IP address is transmitted when you send an email to police?
 
 
C. Paucher, or is it Jürgen Sonneck from Munich’s Referat für Bildung und Sport?

German Labor Ministry BMAS prefers things covered up and not published on the net

cc JC, Dieter Reiter, SG, LSG, BSG

Howdy Anette @BMAS_Bund ,

Two things upfront, sweetheart. Don’t bullshit me. Don’t get smug on me. Haiyaa, Uncle Roger don’t like. There is no case needed with the IFG. You’re a pathetic little liar. And if you need one court case, it’s right there, pumpkin pie: Case 51482/18 (ECHR Single-Judge decision). Gabisce!

Here’s daddy’s suggestion, honey. Publish the crap (i.e. your reply to me from Sept.) on the interwebz at ‘FragDenStaat‘ and we take it from there. Okidokey? I treasure openness and it will get friggin’ open. Will it get embarrassing? You fuckin’ betcha, chiquita. Keywords: your civil servant criminals Martina Musati, Manni Jäger and the ball less fucktard. You might leisurely add to those freaks the racist criminals A. Farrenkopf, S. Nowack et al. from the friggin’ Jobcenter.

The question is simple:

What is the purpose of a ‘Freedom of Information Act’ when it covers criminals funded by BMAS? We are talking libel and black mailing.

Honey, since we are at it, could you mayhaps tell me why some bloke claims his name to be rotten fuckface C. Paucher when in reality his name is racist Jürgen Sonneck, formerly Jobcenter Munich? Ask Dieter Reiter, he prolly can give assistance. Better yet, here is the address of the idiot:

Landeshauptstadt München – Referat für Bildung und Sport
Bayerstraße 28, 80335 München
Telefon: +49 89 23396777

And get this, no fuckin’ civil servant shitface of you insufferable Krauts sends me and my daughter police using a false name. We clear, sugar tits? Tell pancake face, aka Hubsi Heil, I expect full damages and make sure my daughter gets a new Mac, you fuckin’ Ugly Racist Germans.

So, Princess Peach, get the stuff done on FdS and one more thing, lift the fucking block of @ErebusSagace.

Why, then, ’tis none to you, for there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so. To me it is a Naziland.

Preciate taking your time, Sugar Plum.

Cheerio

German Labor Ministry BMAS, via the stupidity of frigtard Jürgen Sonneck to “Certified German Criminal Civil Servants Fachkräfte”

German Labor Minister Hubsi Heil pondering socialist aesthetics of a double chin while Dieter’s getting pumped for the day.

Howdy @BMAS_Bund (blocked), German Labor Minister Heil, mayor of Munich Town Reiter @StadtMuenchen, Detlef @Bundesagentur (blocked), introducing Missus fucking Stupid, Douche-McGouche Jürgen Sonneck aka C. Paucher.

Jürgen Sonneck aka C. Paucher

Hubsi, Dieter, Detlef, how could this pathetic blunder happen? In the province of Bavaria, with its aborigines, the beacon of intellect, the living proof of Darwin’s flawed theory.

Germany is known for its ‘Fachkräfte’, so there is no reason why this hallmark should not be extended to German criminal civil servants. IOW Dieter & Hubsi & Detlef, let’s together work on setting the standards for “Certified German Criminal Civil Servants Fachkräfte”. Nothing less. Remember Tom Peters’ mantra: “distinct… or extinct”.

One thing is clear, hairloss cum stupidity is too much a society can bear and Jürgen Sonneck’s stupidity is ginormous. It runs full metal jacket against the minimum standards of criminality one would expect from a Teutonic civil servant.

So much to learn from this Bavarian mook Jürgen with his above room temperature IQ. Hubsi, Dieter, Detlef, when one of your criminal civil servants intends to email a criminal libelous complaint to police using a false name the next time, here are eight concise points to adhere to.

  1. Get a fucking burner tablet in a store. Pay with cash, not card!
  2. Create a NEW identity with Google. One that does not point to you, douche-canoe.
  3. Google ‘How to Bypass Gmail Phone Verification in 2020’ and ‘How to Create Gmail Without Phone Number’ if need be, twat waffle.
  4. Move your ass to a different place, dingleberry. When sending an email to police or any other gov. place, your IP address is recorded as well! Living in Munich, take the train to Lengries, Garmisch, or so. Find open Wifi. Better yet, book a cheap train ticket to Austria or if you like South Tyrol, Sterzing. Beautiful place. Same there, look for public Wifi, enjoy cake and cappuccino and do your rotten thing, fuckin’ creep.
  5. BUT KEEP THIS IN MIND! If your complaint with police is referring to a CEO of an office at which you work – man, are you a total moron?! Obfuscation is the game in town, sucker. Deflect. Every idiot knows you never rob a bank in your neighborhood!
  6. For fuck’s sake douche nozzle, keep chronology in mind. Do not rush it! Let time work for you, dimwit. When the court decision on a case you filed was made on a particular day and you dash off your email to police on that day … For Christ’s sake, this is a rookie mistake, you fucktard.
    With full-blown idiots like Jürgen Sonneck one can not even raid a Currywurst Bude. Ends up like Bobby Lasorda in ‘Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead’.
  7. Remember wangbadan, it’s called a burner tablet for a reason. Once done, destroy it, burn it and throw it into a dumpster.
  8. Lastly, never bank on courts that they keep on refusing inspection of files.

Hubsi Heil, Dieter, Detlef, anything to add from your side? Remember Tom Peters: “If you are not confused then you are not paying attention.”

I do not consider it necessary to explicitly explain that I of course demand full restitution of damages by that little pony! Do you Ugly Germans have anymore cheap tricks up your sleeve involving basement associates with @BMAS_Bund and @Bundesagentur ? Perhaps Swatting, Hubsi?! “There is nothing like race, is there?” as Oscar Wilde suggested.

Ave atque vale

PS. Most of it happened under your predecessor, the hideously ugly fucking fat frump Andrea Nahles. Detlef didn’t qualify for a picture. Lacks any aesthetics.