The complaint and background is here and here the letter from a year ago.
The European Court of Human Rights has decided in a single-judge setting to declare the above complaint inadmissible.
The decision of the Court is annexed hereto.
This decision is final and is not subject to appeal to a tripartite committee, a chamber or to the Grand Chamber. Therefore, you will not receive any further letters from the Court in this case. The Court shall not keep the file in its archives for more than one year from the date of this decision. (1)
This Decision shall be rendered in one of the two official languages of the Court (English or French) and shall not be translated into other languages.
The Registry of the European Court of Human Rights
. . . . . . . . . .
introduced on 29 October 2018
The European Court of Human Rights, sitting on 10 January 2019 in a single-judge formation pursuant to Articles 24 § 2 and 27 of the Convention, has examined the application as submitted.
The Court finds in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or the Protocols thereto and that the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention have not been met.
The Court declares the application inadmissible.
And here is His Stupidity Jürgen Sonneck in person. Why did nobody tell moron Jürgen the IP address is transmitted when you send an email to police?